System of assessment of pupils in the college

Generally in most advanced schooling organizations all over the world, they normally use a system that is four-point assessing students’ knowledge, abilities and abilities: “excellent”, “good”, “satisfactory” and “unsatisfactory”.

Knowing the concept of points

The assessment “excellent” deserves a student who may have discovered comprehensive, systematic and knowledge that is deep the capability to independently perform the tasks provided by this program, knowledgeable about the primary and extra literature, suggested by this system. Such an assessment also requires the mastering associated with the relationship involving the basic ideas of discipline and their importance for the obtained career.

The evaluation “good” sets the student who has got learned the academic and program material in full, successfully fulfills the program’s tasks, worked out of the literature that is main by this program. This is certainly, a student who has got shown the systematic nature of discipline knowledge and it is with the capacity of self-replenishment and upgrading in the act of further educational work and professional activity.

The grades “satisfactory” deserve a student who’s got found the data associated with the fundamental material that is educational the extent essential for further training and future work with a profession, effective at doing the tasks given to because of the program, acquainted with the key literary works recommended by this system. This assessment is presented to students who have made flaws in the answer to the exam and in the performance of the exam assignments, but have demonstrated the ability to eliminate them as a rule.

The evaluation is “unsatisfactory” for the pupil that has understanding of gaps which has resulted in fundamental errors in the utilization of the tasks given to because of the program, that is, a student who is struggling to carry on education or begin professional activities after graduation without additional training in the relevant discipline.

Shortcomings of four-point assessment rating and system system

A four-way system for assessing students’ knowledge, abilities and abilities requires significant enhancement or replacement. Its main disadvantages are: inadequate motivation for the determination of educational and cognitive activity, given that it is targeted on obtaining at the least knowledge (“made up” – “did not make up”); made for the reproduction of knowledge and thinking (in sessional conditions, quickly accumulated information quickly “weathered”); subjectivity when you look at the assessment of student’s knowledge; inconsistency aided by the college system, which students used as former students, etc.

Together with the four-point old-fashioned system of assessment of pupils’ knowledge, the score system of evaluation, that is in line with the accumulation of grades for a particular amount of study (module, semester, year, whole term of training) for an extensive educational and intellectual activity, is starting to become ever more popular. The sum of the these assessments functions as a quantitative indicator of this quality of academic and cognitive activity regarding the student in comparison to the successes of their other students.

The score system for assessing students’ knowledge, skills and abilities is based on the principles that are following

  • each educational discipline and the student’s work with its mastering is examined into the credit units, the total amount of that is based on the score;
  • the record of this pupil’s present work must certanly be kept, which will be mirrored within the last assessment (in the units of credits);
  • the peculiarities of teaching subjects that are differentcomplexity, significance of control when you look at the curriculum) are considered, this is certainly, the complexity factor (importance);
  • availability of different sorts of control (outgoing, current, intermediate, final);

The student rating for a semester or 12 months is described as the arithmetic that is average of rating for every discipline.

To implement a rating system for assessing students’ knowledge, specific conditions are very important: the readiness of instructors and pupils to perceive them; appropriate organizational and methodological support, in particular, separate work of students is obligatory; introduction of modular training; work accounting in the form of special tables; application of written verification of real information, etc.